<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GeoCyber &#187; 研究</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geocyber.org/blog/tag/study/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geocyber.org/blog</link>
	<description>Thinking about space in the cyberspace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>生態水文學或水文生態學：一個&#8221;新典範&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://geocyber.org/blog/ecohydrology</link>
		<comments>http://geocyber.org/blog/ecohydrology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dongpo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[學術]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[生態]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[研究]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[水文]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geocyber.org/blog/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[本文翻譯自Hanah, DM. PJ Wood and JP Sadler (2004). Ecohydrology and hydroecology: A &#8216;New Paragiam&#8217;?, Hydrological Process. 18:3439-3455. Available from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hyp.5761
  最近的許多文獻清楚地顯示出生態水文(ecohydrology, eco-hydrology)和水文生態(hydroecology, hydro-ecology)已經標記全球環境的議程上，包含二個HPToday的評論(Bond, 2003;Pringle, 2003)、期刊的專題(e.g.Gurnell et al., 2000; Zalewski, 2000;Kundzewicz, 2002; Baird et al.,2004)、新的期刊(Zalewski and Harper, 2001)、一些書籍(e.g.Baird andWilby, 1999; Eagleson, 2002; Rodriguez-Iturbe, 2003)、和國際間的研討會主題(e.g. Acreman, 2001)。然而，儘管新學科的浮現增加了關注和需求(e.g. Zalewski and Robarts, 2003)，學科內容的見解主張仍然處於什麼是該學科應專注的部份(e.g. Bonell, 2002)，特別是一堆重要的問題需要被分門別類：
  (1)什麼是生態水文和水文生態?這二個名詞可以被清楚的定義和了解嗎?
  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geocyber.org/blog/ecohydrology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
